DIGITAL HEALTH RESOURCE LIBRARY · STUDY PROTOCOL
Survivor Advocacy Dashboard
Supports survivor advocacy work by tracking advocacy priorities, stories and engagement without exposing clinical records.
Educational profile reviewed October 6, 2026 · Registry reference d8291eff-e005-4fb8-ba2a-8191605df13e
Access and learning pathway
Review current member eligibility, primary tool selection, and access terms in the verified member pathway. The complimentary program assigns one primary digital tool to each seat. Your approved internship study access follows its own reviewer pathway.
Review member access arrangementsProduct mapping confirmed in the provider registry on October 23, 2026. Open licensed applications through your assigned member access pathway.
This study protocol helps you prepare an evaluation, record observations, and identify questions for the tool owner. Confirm the available features and current instructions in the tool before performing the fictional test.
Product evidence and next test
Advocacy application · partial workflow evidence
The live provider registry confirms the advocacy project. Current source has public resources and protected personal routes. The inspected scheduling and care-plan action buttons display toast messages; task completion for those controls remains unsupported.
Current task: Evaluate one fictional advocacy item and verify its tags, filtering, and persistence.
Access: Provider account for personal routes, applicable primary entitlement, and the stated story permissions.
Acceptance evidence needed: Identify the implemented priority and tagging workflow and verify save/read behavior. Confirm scheduling and care-plan actions reach working destinations before using those claims in a demonstration.
Production workflow verification remains pending following restricted browser access on October 23, 2026. Saved study notes belong to the CSPN notebook; product workflow and product storage each require their own acceptance test.
Who benefits
- Advocates organising priorities across a season
- Research interns studying how advocacy themes are categorised
- Operations interns reviewing engagement follow-up
Original fictional study scenario
Use the current task and acceptance notes above when planning your evaluation.
Fictional example: "Advocate Jordan M." logs a fictional priority — clearer cardio-oncology follow-up reminders — tags it, and links it to an engagement event with no names or diagnoses recorded.
Study sequence
- Read the survivor-story permission rules first.
- Add or review advocacy priorities and tag their themes.
- Record engagement events at a summary level.
- Only include a story when written permission exists, and never clinical detail.
Outputs to examine
- Tagged advocacy priorities
- Engagement summaries
- Theme counts over time
Focused evaluation
Enter a synthetic priority with an invented theme and confirm it can be tagged and filtered without any personal field.
Your tailored study record
Save and revisit this work
Save fictional examples and approved program learning material to your CSPN notebook. Each save creates a new revision available to you and authorized program reviewers. Use the private care channel agreed with your clinical team for personal health records.
Loading your notebook access…
Survivor Advocacy Dashboard Registry reference: d8291eff-e005-4fb8-ba2a-8191605df13e Fictional advocacy priority Unanswered How the priority reaches a responsible contact Unanswered Approved material and privacy boundaries Unanswered Follow-up owner, date, and success measure Unanswered
Carry this into your internship
Link the saved notebook reference to your weekly journal, explain the role-specific learning, and submit any evidence through Secure Uploads. Record uncertain capabilities as questions for the tool owner.